An important step forward

The ADAS Alliance views the type approval of FSD Supervised by the RDW as an important step forward. It is a major step in the technical evolution of driver assistance systems (ADAS) towards the autonomous vehicles of the future. We view this technology primarily as a supporting tool that, when used correctly, can increase safety on the road. However, we are also critical of the development of autonomous functions while the driver remains responsible; this poses risks.

The executive remains at the helm

It is crucial to keep the definitions clear. FSD Supervised is a driver assistance system and not a self-driving system. On the international automation scale, this technology is at level 2 (out of 5). This means that the driver remains legally and factually responsible for performing the driving task.

Incidentally, we find the naming confusing. FSD Supervised gives many people the impression that it concerns a self-driving system. It is a step in the right direction that the word 'supervised’ has been added. However, the naming of the system remains unnecessarily confusing. We therefore call upon all car manufacturers to refrain from using terms in the naming of driver assistance systems that have (or could have) a connotation with higher levels of autonomous driving.

The RDW has approved this system after a year and a half of intensive testing on the test track and public roads. An essential part of that approval is strict monitoring: the vehicle continuously checks whether the driver is alert. It is a supplement to human observation, not a replacement for it. The system performs tasks, but the human remains responsible.

The focus of the ADAS Alliance in 2026

The introduction of such systems makes it all the more urgent that motorists understand how their vehicle works. Therefore, the ADAS Alliance has formulated the following priorities for 2026:

• Education: Since April 1, 2026, ADAS has been a mandatory part of the CBR theory exam for passenger cars. We fully support this initiative, because knowledge of the operation and limitations of the systems forms the basis for safe use.
• Better instruction: We advocate for improved explanations during the delivery of both new and used vehicles. In this regard, it is important that the car dealership can see which systems are installed on the car. A driver must know what to look out for when the system is active.  
• Infrastructure and interaction: A safe system depends on its environment. The ADAS Alliance supports road authorities in improving the alignment between vehicle and infrastructure, including through the use of 'ADAS maps'.
• Reporting point for experiences: We support initiatives for a reporting point where drivers can share experiences when systems do not function properly. This feedback is invaluable for the continuous improvement of both vehicle software and our infrastructure.

Outlook

While we look at possible approval throughout the entire European Union, Jos van Kleef (Chairman of the ADAS Alliance) and Robert-Jan van der Zwaag (RDW) emphasize the importance of a proper rollout in the Netherlands. We will therefore closely monitor developments. The technology is there to support us, but the responsibility for traffic behavior remains inextricably linked to the driver.

By making optimal use of systems, understanding the technology, and remaining critical of the interaction with our environment, we are jointly building a safer future on Dutch roads.